But if your battery would have a 70% lifespan after 3 years, is pushing that back to 3 years and 3 months really a significant difference? Is that extra 3 months of lifespan worth the inconveniences of needing to charge more frequently and have your battery last shorter periods?. When push comes to shove you're maybe looking at a 10% boost in longevity if you use it. Your charge circuitry is going to modulate charge voltage through the charge to more carefully preserve the higher end of your battery. Hot batteries die faster in a nonlinear fashion. Your battery is going to get hot because you're charging it faster than a trickle. You're buying a tablet so Samsung is going to overprovision their tablet battery (because some people use their tablets a lot and will go through 600 cycles within the warranty period). At least theoretically.īut if you read further into that article, you'll realize you're *never* going to see those idealistic conditions. That's a pretty substantial 50% boost in longevity. But you're looking at ~600ish cycles vs ~900ish cycles under ideal slow charging at room temperature for a lithium polymer battery charged to a low voltage with no overprovisioning. Some are telling me it's okay to not use it, while others are telling me to use it? I wish Samsung released their test results or something. Tips to save battery life Change application sync settings Lower screen brightness and timeout duration Turn on Airplane Mode if traveling to an area without. Looks like nobody knows for sure if this feature really works (or has a significant impact on battery life).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |